|
|
|
|
|
by motorest
351 days ago
|
|
> What's funny is you're completely backwards here. Microsoft has a much more modern view of the cloud than AWS where everything is a thin veneer over EC2. Azure started as PaaS first and AWS started as IaaS first and that fingerprint is still all over their products. Irrelevant. I don't care about either history or revisionism. I care about deploying apps/functions. In AWS each lambda function is a standalone resource, whereas in AWS you need to 1) provisional an app service plan, 2) deploy a function app on said service plan, 3) deploy the actual function. It's nuts. Same goes for storage. While in AWS you just go ahead and create a S3 bucket, on Azures you have to providion storage accounts and then provision a blob storage container. > Building everything in a VM is the most expensive and naive way to adopt the cloud. Azure is more expensive, harder to manage, even more impossible to estimate costs. Making claims about cost as if it makes Azure look good sounds completely crazy. |
|