[repelsteeltje]

> Overall simple security design flaws but it's good to see a company that cares to fix them, even if they didn't take security seriously from the start.

It depends on what you mean by simple security design flaws. I'd rather frame it as, neglect or incompetence.

That isn't the same as malice, of course, and they deserve credits for their relatively professional response as you already pointed out.

But, come on, it reeks of people not understanding what they're doing. Not appreciating the context of a complicated device and delivering a high end service.

If they're not up to it, they should not be doing this.

[memesarecool]

Yes I meant simple as in "amateur mistakes". From the mistakes (and their excitement and response to the report) they are clueless about security. Which of course is bad. Hopefully they will take security more seriously on the future.