|
|
|
|
|
|
by seanhunter
359 days ago
|
|
|
No. Prison for contempt of court. He lost a civil case related to the libel and was ordered to pay the victim and not repeat the libel (by showing his film). He decided to show his film at a rally, and the court deemed this contempt and sentenced him to prison. However you frame it, that’s not “prison for libel”. That’s prison for contempt of court. He was ordered not to do a thing. He decided to do the thing. So the court sent him to prison. |
|
|
Really if there is any part you should disagree with it's "Home invasion child rapists were given less time"