[PeeMcGee]

> That does not mean there isn't an AI system that can do X.

You are holding the burden of proof here...

[amelius]

No, Carmack holds the burden of proof because he started the argument. His incapable program does not prove anything.

Maybe this is formulated a bit harshly, but let us respect the logic here.

[jeffreygoesto]

One of my supervisors used to say: "Don't tell me it's impossible, tell me _you_ could not do it." A true c_nt move that ends every discussion.

[amelius]

Huh, by saying that something is impossible, __you__ are ending the discussion, not your professor.

[lucumo]

No. Pointing out a flaw in an argument doesn't require proving the opposite.