[Foreignborn]

yes, but those aren’t released and even then you’ll always need glue code.

you just need to knowingly resource what glue code is needed, and build it in a way it can scale with whatever new limits that upgraded models give you.

i can’t imagine a world where people aren’t building products that try to overcome the limitations of SOTA models

[storus]

My point is that newer models will have those baked in, so instead of supporting ~30 tools before falling apart they will reliably support 10,000 tools defined in their context. That alone would dramatically change the need for more than one agent in most cases as the architectural split into multiple agents is often driven by the inability to reliably run many tools within a single agent. Now you can hack around it today by turning tools on/off depending on the agent's state but at some point in the future you might afford not to bother and just dump all your tools to a long stable context, maybe cache it for performance, and that will be it.

[ZYbCRq22HbJ2y7]

There will likely be custom, large, and expensive models at an enterprise level in the near future (some large entities and governments already have them (niprgpt)).

With that in mind, what would be the business sense in siloing a single "Agent" instead of using something like a service discovery service that all benefit from?

[storus]

My guess is the main issue is latency and accuracy; a single agent without all the routing/evaluation sub-agents around it that introduce cumulative errors, lead to infinite loops and slow it down would likely be much faster, accurate and could be cached at the token level on a GPU, reducing token preprocessing time further. Now different companies would run different "monorepo" agents and those would need something like MCP to talk to each other at the business boundary, but internally all this won't be necessary.

Also the current LLMs have still too many issues because they are autoregressive and heavily biased towards the first few generated tokens. They also still don't have full bidirectional awareness of certain relationships due to how they are masked during the training. Discrete diffusion looks interesting but I am not sure how does that one deal with tools as I've never seen a model from that class using any tools.