Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tempfile 362 days ago
Because the enterprise is not owned or controlled by you, and you don't get to set the rules. If you can negotiate better conditions, and nobody else on the market can undercut you, then you can have them. This isn't even an abstract consequence of capitalism, it is an axiomatic, defining feature. If you don't like it, you are rejecting capitalism.
2 comments

Unfettered capitalism is bad. We are just discussing which fetters it should have.
I am rejecting it. Enough is enough.