[Expurple]

> multiple error variants that reference the same source error type which I always had issues with in `thiserror`.

Huh?

    #[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
    enum CustomError {
        #[error("failed to open a: {0}")]
        A(std::io::Error),
        #[error("failed to open b: {0}")]
        B(std::io::Error),
    }
    
    fn main() -> Result<(), CustomError> {
        std::fs::read_to_string("a").map_err(CustomError::A)?;
        std::fs::read_to_string("b").map_err(CustomError::B)?;
        Ok(())
    }

If I understand correctly, the main feature of snafu is "merely" reducing the boilerplace when adding context:

    low_level_result.context(ErrorWithContextSnafu { context })?;
    // vs
    low_level_result.map_err(|err| ErrorWithContext { err, context })?;

But to me, the win seems to small to justify the added complexity.

[shepmaster]

You certainly can use thiserror to accomplish the same goals! However, your example does a little subtle slight-of-hand that you probably didn't mean to and leaves off the enum name (or the `use` statement):

    low_level_result.context(ErrorWithContextSnafu { context })?;
    low_level_result.map_err(|err| CustomError::ErrorWithContext { err, context })?;

Other small details:

- You don't need to move the inner error yourself.

- You don't need to use a closure, which saves a few characters. This is even true in cases where you have a reference and want to store the owned value in the error:

    #[derive(Debug, Snafu)]
    struct DemoError { source: std::io::Error, filename: PathBuf }

    let filename: &Path = todo!();
    result.context(OpenFileSnafu { filename })?; // `context` will change `&Path` to `PathBuf`

- You can choose to capture certain values implicitly, such as a source file location, a backtrace, or your own custom data (the current time, a global-ish request ID, etc.)

----

As an aside:

    #[error("failed to open a: {0}")]

It is now discouraged to include the text of the inner error in the `Display` of the wrapping error. Including it leads to duplicated data when printing out chains of errors in a nicer / structured manner. SNAFU has a few types that work to undo this duplication, but it's better to avoid it in the first place.