[vel0city]

Your main point was based on an untrue statement of "in front of the press" and attributing their writers making statements as official binding correspondence from a company and yet you say I'm making bad faith arguments. It wasn't a press event, it was a developer training session.

A newspaper repeating an official position that can't be found anywhere else other than a guy giving a talk about live tiles and other news sites like this. And yet we don't care about that he also stated live tiles weren't going away and yet that clearly wasn't true either.

And in the end even if we take an article written by someone unaffiliated with Microsoft as a contract that now binds Microsoft forever, what's "the life of the device"? The warranty period? Two years? Five years? One hundred years?

Where are my pancakes? I saw someone wrote you were going to give free pancakes. After all we have to hold people to things they never officially stated just because other unrelated people keep repeating it.

[gpm]

My main point continues to be entirely true, the statement was unambiguously made in front of the press, as proved by the press quoting it.

The same statement as quoted by the newspaper (note: not a blog) globalnews can in fact be found elsewhere, quoted by other press sites. I didn't find the original - perhaps it was taken down or only made in a press release - but since e.g. arstechnica includes it in literal quotes I have no doubt that this is a literal quote of an official microsoft position..

Considering your continued bad faith arguments, and apparently deliberate mistatements of facts, I will now stop responding to you.

[vel0city]

I've seen multiple posts now suggesting you're giving free pancakes. Where are these pancakes? You haven't said you aren't giving pancakes, must be true.

> and apparently deliberate mistatements of facts

Yeah, you should stop misstating facts like "Microsoft employee tasked with public relations declaring it so at a Microsoft event in front of the press is Microsoft marketing it that way", because that's not what happened.

> as proved by the press quoting it.

The quotes you see are from the recordings of the event. Are Netflix movies also statements given to the press? You can go watch it today. Instead you'll ignore actually looking into it and say I'm just making misstatements despite you not even knowing the source and the history of it.

[vel0city]

A good article talking about this as well:

https://web.archive.org/web/20211014012149/https://www.pcwor...