[quanto]

I had a colleague, an architect deeply soaked in the Design Thinking cool aid, telling me that architecting a single-family house is humankind's most intellectually challenging endeavor because he has to worry about the end users and construction materials that go in ("holistic[TM]"). I asked him if building a space shuttle is easier than building a house, and he genuinely believed that engineers have a far easier (and dumber) time than designers like himself.

This take of designers being superior being to engineers is something I consistently observed among designers over the decade.

Here is a light-hearted video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvU5dmu4sl8

[_annum]

Your colleague is wrong and this is a tired debate, but neither are easy.

Engineering deals mostly with objective outcomes. Space shuttle designers have a clear goal and measurable performance metrics. The problems are extremely hard but the design constraints permit a more focused development process.

Architecture is technical but mostly subjective, and deals with a host of multi-disciplinary and social concerns. It's quite open-ended and difficult to settle on an optimal approach. Extreme budget limitations, building code, zoning restrictions, public consultation, and the idiosyncrasies of personal taste complicate this process further. Full-size prototyping is also less common and it's almost impossible to truly test the outcome of a design before actually constructing something.

Building a house and building a perfect house are drastically different accomplishments. A lot of people will even hate the perfect house – there's no winning!

I have a great deal of respect for engineers and (competent) architects. The latter are rare.