[ost-ing]

Im not saying that any of this excuses the nationalist movement Israel is today, im just stating a fact that semitic descendants in Europe have heritage to those lands. Just because someone appears white and blue-eyed doesn't necessarily negate that.

Judaism is an ethno-religion, so while some people may have no connection to semitic people, others will have a closer connection and its discriminatory to simply say “they are not native” which my original post was critical of.

[prmoustache]

> im just stating a fact that semitic descendants in Europe have heritage to those lands

Heritage that is so remote that it doesn't matter anymore. Most of their ancestors left centuries ago.

It is like me claiming the land of any country between Ethiopia and Botswana, installing a government and colonies, seizing lands and forcing their inhabitants to flee in a small strip of land along a rontier because modern human is claimed to come from this area so I declare it my home.

[ost-ing]

> It is like me claiming the land of any country

Im not talking about claiming land - I’m talking about culture, racial identity and their heritage to lands. You keep bringing this as a talking point, but I already said heritage does not equate to or justify nationalism.

> Heritage that is so remote that it doesn't matter anymore. Most of their ancestors left centuries ago.

It doesn't matter? Obviously it does matter. I wonder if you think the same of African Americans and your willingness to deny them of African heritage.

What about eastern european Jews that actually look semitic, that have middle eastern features? Do you also negate them of heritage, or just white skinned Jews?

Your bias is palpable.

[prmoustache]

> I wonder if you think the same of African Americans and your willingness to deny them of African heritage.

Having heritage is one thing, migrating there as well. But landing somewhere, installing a new flag and government and pushing people out of their land through force is completely out of line.

> What about eastern european Jews that actually look semitic, that have middle eastern features? Do you also negate them of heritage, or just white skinned Jews?

I am not negating heritage, I am negating the appropriation of a land at the expense of others.

[ost-ing]

> But landing somewhere, installing a new flag and government and pushing people out of their land through force is completely out of line.

Nobody is debating that.

Not sure if you can read, so I’ll reiterate - the debate here is the willingness of people to use sweeping and discriminatory terminology to categorise all the different types of Jew's as being “non-native” which is categorically false and frankly offensive.