|
|
|
|
|
by mtmail
353 days ago
|
|
One of arguments seems to be based on climate change denial "Together, these [six main offices of NOAS] form a colossal operation that has become one of the main
drivers of the climate change alarm industry and, as such, is harmful to future U.S. prosperity. This industry’s mission emphasis on prediction and management seems designed around the fatal conceit of planning for the unplannable" "Scientific agencies like NOAA are vulnerable to obstructionism of an Administration’s aims if political
appointees are not wholly in sync with Administration policy. Particular attention must be paid to appointments in this area." |
|
Absolutely mind-boggling that someone can put that in writing with a straight face.