Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by loeg 351 days ago
Well, it's in std. So there's an appeal to authority (the C++ language authors should be smart, right?) and convenience.
1 comments

There are still others in <random>. Yet they always use the cool twister one with the funny numbers
There's std::linear_congruential_engine, but it doesn't provide you with any (good) default parameters; only the bad ones from historical rand() implementations (minstd_rand0 / minstd_rand).
What alternative within <random> would you recommend and why?