|
|
|
|
|
by swores
356 days ago
|
|
Had they said "the array will be so large it'll have its own gravity." then you'd be making a valid point. But they didn't say just "gravity", they said "gravity well". > "First, let us simply define what a gravity well is. A gravity well is a term used metaphorically to describe the gravitational pull that a large body exerts in space." - https://medium.com/intuition/what-are-gravity-wells-3c1fb6d6... So they weren't suggesting that it will be big enough to get past some boundary below which things don't have gravity, just that smaller things don't have enough gravity to matter. |
|
"Large" is almost meaningless in this context. Douglas Adams put it best
> Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space.
From an education site:
> Everything with mass is able to bend space and the more massive an object is, the more it bends
They start with an explanation of a marble compared to a bowling ball. Both have a gravity well, but one exerts far more influence
https://www.howitworksdaily.com/the-solar-system-what-is-a-g...