[throwawayffffas]

But not more challenging than counter battery against teams firing Javelins or other portable anti tank weapons.Or teams using Switchblades.

FPVs are man portable guided munitions, not artillery. Pretty much all existing man portable guided anti tank weapons are better than FPVs at their job.

And artillery is better than any of them at it's job. While FPVs can score kills they have minimal suppression effects, when an FPV hits a friendly, everyone else is going to keep moving, because stopping will offer them no benefit from the next one, and the next one might be minutes out. When an artillery round lands everyone hits the deck.

[103e]

FPVs don't seem anti-tank replacement -- they do seem to have a role against soft targets ie against massing infantry, c2 nodes or suppression of enemy mortars. In this role, from a distance, they seem harder to suppress than the alternative, ie mortars.

Also these are immature tech... I suspect at least some of the issues identified will be mitigated in time.

[koonsolo]

> Pretty much all existing man portable guided anti tank weapons are better than FPVs at their job.

Sure, but a Javelin missile costs more than $200K. You can have 200 fpv drones for that price.

[throwawayffffas]

Yeah, but it takes like two guys to carry and use the javelin. 200 fpv drones need like a company to be deployed.