|
|
|
|
|
|
by vlovich123
358 days ago
|
|
|
That doesn't require parallelism, just concurrency. But yes, you'd use a similar task-local map/reduce construct to express doing a bunch of concurrent I/O in parallel (spawning each I/O on a separate thread would be counter-productive & a hack to enable not adding an event loop / async I/O). |
|
|