[aiisahik]

I don't think you can calculate the cost of serverless compute this way. What containers do you have that run "non-stop"?

If the container doesn't run any workloads, it doesn't cost you anything. Most of the compute i pay for sit idle most of the time.

This is amazing pricing.

[develatio]

Say I want to deploy a service that is currently receiving 1rps at a constant rate, no upticks, no gaps. Wouldn’t that be the cost? If the answer is “yes”, then no, that is a terrible pricing.

[rohan_]

Don’t host your website on containers, that’s what workers are for

[psibi]

Aren't you limited with Workers ? Like would you be able to deploy a OCaml or a Haskell application using it ?

[sofixa]

Realistically, almost nobody has this type of usage. And for those that do, yes, serverless autoscaling up from zero is not appropriate.

[develatio]

True. Most services (unless your service is a demo/toy project, as I stated earlier) have way more traffic. It might not be evenly distributed though the day, but if you add all the CPU time in a day, I’m sure it will exceed 24h. So that leaves me with the question for who is this? Developers that are starting and want to deploy something small?

[ignoramous]

> leaves me with the question for who is this

The blog post answers this. Containers was built for folks who wanted to move rest of their workloads onto Cloudflare alongside Workers/R2/AI & other offerings.

From my experience, the Workers platform is real popular among indie developers, software shops, and shops building SaaS, who typically want zero-dev ops setup and usually pass down hosting costs to their customers.

That said, compared to new cloud providers like Fly/Railway, the pricing is indeed steep.