[iLemming]

> I don't see why it would be a universal truth that a good programmer is someone who invests in their tools.

I have never said that. However, since you decided to go that direction. I can bite and entertain you. Here is a list of programmers, some of them I'm sure you'd even recognize. Donald Knuth, Rob Pike, Ken Thompson, Steve Yegge, Gary Bernhardt, Paul Graham, Rich Hickey, Bram Moolenaar, Richard Stallman, Anders Hejlsberg, Guido van Rossum, John Carmack, Tim Pope, Drew Neil, Sindre Sorhus, TJ Holowaychuk, Guillermo Rauch, Ryan Dahl, Fabrice Bellard.

The pattern is clear: many of the best programmers are also prolific tool-builders.

[norir]

I don't even understand what point you are making. The essence of programming is tool making. Of course the best programmers make tools as do the worst. Are you seriously comparing making a terminal hot rod configuration app to, say, creating Tex?

[iLemming]

> Being a programmer is not about configuring your development environment.

My point is that being a programmer is also about configuring one's development environment. Exactly because like you said: "the essence of programming is tool making". I just don't understand how it is different - configuring a tool, extending its functionality, adding more features to it from developing a [different] tool from scratch? Both is programming. Shit done by programmers. You don't call one bunch "pseudo-programmers" and the other "alpha-programmers" or some shit like that, right?

[cole-k]

> I have never said that.

Then I misunderstood your comment. I read it as "not invested in their tools => not a good programmer."

Reading the replies to my sibling comments, I don't think we really disagree but we probably have different pictures in our heads when reading the context of this thread.