Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by uncircle 363 days ago
> A big part of the difference is that the BSDs are designed by a governing committee

While I cannot agree nor disagree on the quality of BSDs (haven't used one in 20 years), I find it funny that in this case a design by committee is proof of quality.

I guess it's better than design by headless chicken which is how the Linux user-space is developed. Personally, I am a big fan of design by dictatorship, where one guy at the top either has a vision or can reject silly features and ideas with strong-enough words (Torvalds, Jobs, etc.) - this is the only way to create a cohesive experience, and honestly if it works for the kernel, there's no reason it shouldn't work in userspace.
1 comments
throw0101b 363 days ago
> While I cannot agree nor disagree on the quality of BSDs (haven't used one in 20 years), I find it funny that in this case a design by committee is proof of quality.

I don't think "design" is correct word: organized, managed, or ran perhaps.

> The FreeBSD Project is run by FreeBSD committers, or developers who have direct commit access to the master Git repository.[1] The FreeBSD Core Team exists to provide direction and is responsible for setting goals for the FreeBSD Project and to provide mediation in the event of disputes, and also takes the final decision in case of disagreement between individuals and teams involved in the project.[2]

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeBSD_Core_Team

There is no BDFL, à la Linux or formerly Python: it's a 'board of directors'. Decisions are mostly dispute / policy-focused, and less technical for a particular bit of code.

link
8fingerlouie 363 days ago
They fill the same position as a BDFL though.

They decide what gets included in the default distribution, they set the goals and provider sponsorships for achieving them.

So yes, board of directors is probably more fitting.

And then of course you have the people with a commit bit. They can essentially work on whatever they like, but inclusion into the main branch is still up to the core team.

There was a huge debate some years ago when Netgate sponsored development/porting of WireGuard to FreeBSD, and the code was of a poor quality, and was ultimately removed from FreeBSD 13.

link
eikenberry 363 days ago
Similar to Debian's governing structure.
link