Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by throwaway97894 366 days ago
That is a very dishonest interpretation not only because the national registry is not a mere question of census but of identity, but because the Supreme Court clearly outlines that it in black and white that it is about the question of Jewish supremacy.

from the article:

> the court explained that doing so would have “weighty implications” on the State of Israel and could pose a danger to Israel’s founding principle: to be a Jewish state for the Jewish people.

1 comments

I think you are dishonestly interpreting it, but I'm not going to engage with a throwaway account.