[yjftsjthsd-h]

> while running tons of containers for basic tasks.

Those containers run on a monolithic kernel; what's your point?

[pjmlp]

The supposed performance gains from monolithic kernel being wasted on features that mimic microkernel features.

[yjftsjthsd-h]

> The supposed performance gains from monolithic kernel being wasted on features that mimic microkernel features.

So two things:

1. Containers don't have a meaningful performance hit. (They are semi-frequently used with things that can have a perf hit, like overlay filesystems, but this is generally easy to skip when it matters.)

2. I don't think containers meaningfully mimic microkernel features. If I run everything on my laptop in a container, and a device driver crashes, then the machine is still hosed.

[pjmlp]

1. The amount of memory consumption I see, versus traditional processes, must be a mirage.

2. It depends on what the containers are being used for. Microkernels aren't only about using drivers in userspace.

[Vilian]

And still manage to run better than a complete microkernel

[pjmlp]

So goes the mythological tales from ancient times.

That is what happens when people don't update themselves.