|
|
|
|
|
|
by thomasf1
5039 days ago
|
|
|
Well... The main patent in this case is the "bounce-back patent". Where would you draw the line of what´s patentable? To me this seems actually to trivial as with most software patents. In terms of software it´s not really the implementation that´s protected, more the concept... (Nobody is comparing source code and is looking if it´s coded in the same way) |
|
|