[adastra22]

"net positive" requires a human being existing to judge.

[bayarearefugee]

> "net positive" requires a human being existing to judge.

This is effectively a religious belief you are espousing.

[adastra22]

What do you mean? Religion seems like a total nonsequitur here. If anything I would argue the opposite: you would need religion or something like it for moral statements to have any meaning without the existence of sentient beings.