[karmakaze]

> They're not in open source as a cooperative venture, they are using it to make money

> Existing open source licenses, practices, and culture don't draw this distinction

I disagree for the most part. Corporations avoid copyleft licenses like the plague. It's the term open-source that includes 'free beer' licensed software that created this confusion.

[NoGravitas]

Lots of companies will draw the line in different places. Some will accept GPLv2 but not GPLv3. Some will accept GPLv3 but not AGPLv3.

[burnt-resistor]

Google and Meta have policies against using any AGPL code anywhere.

[pabs3]

I wonder why, it is not like it is hard to comply with.

[burnt-resistor]

Legal absolutism and intransigency, and maybe some ideological retribution. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I paid my dues in MAANG. Business culturally, control seemed all-important. They seemed to want source they could use without giving a dime to maintainers, if they so chose. Some support was given, but not enough and not uniformly.

[MichaelZuo]

It does seem like a strange claim to make…