[loloquwowndueo]

Sorry, they are as canon as the phantom menace even if you don’t like them (neither do I for that matter but hey, if these creators wanted to wreck their legacy who are we to stop them).

[frollogaston]

Reloaded is ok. It's not like Star Wars 1 (which btw isn't real), more like Star Wars 6.

[throwaway422432]

Return of the Jedi (6) was perfectly fine. More like 7 which was ok as a nostalgic cameo vehicle, but resulted in throwing away the Rogue Squadron arc which should have always remained canon.

But not like that hadn't happened before. Anyone remember Splinter of the Mind's Eye, the original sequel to Star Wars?

[bigstrat2003]

Return of the Jedi was in fact the best of the original trilogy. It's weird to use it as a point of comparison like that's a diss.

[frollogaston]

It's not a diss, it was an ok movie. Most people consider it less great than 4 and 5, partially because they redid the big scene in 4.

[Cthulhu_]

It did feel derivative, but then they just did it again with one of the sequels because they could, except this time it's a death planet instead of star/moon. The Empire or whatever they called it had been reduced to a parody / comic relief.

[frollogaston]

And somehow the death planet also has a self-destruct. Well, parody is a good way to put it, the sequels are about as Star Wars as Spaceballs is.

[dheerajvs]

GP's comment is probably a reference to this classic XKCD: https://xkcd.com/566/ (the last panel)