Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jojohohanon 365 days ago
I feel like I missed a preread that teaches me about these strangle super-numeric ip addresses. Eg 400.564.987.500

Am I just seeing ipv6 in an unusually familiar format? Or is it an intentionally malformed format used by wireguard for internal routing?
1 comments
cameroncooper 365 days ago
Looks like modified placeholder addresses because the author didn't want to use real addresses. I don't think it could be used for internal routing since each octet is represented with a single byte (0-255) so having larger numbers for some internal routing would likely break the entire IP stack.
link
Arrowmaster 365 days ago
Yes the author needs to be beaten over the head with RFC 5737.
link