[anonzzzies]

It gives us great productivity. If you write the tests yourself and insist it delivers 100% success without touching the tests themselves, just run them, it is very nice. We wrote a little bit of tooling around it so it instructs and loops until 100% succeed. Even for stuff that's complex enough for seniors to struggle (parsers/compilers), it delivers results after hours instead of days or weeks. But if you miss some tests you can all but guarantee that those things won't work even though an experienced human would automatically do that right as it is illogical for instance. But we would write tests like this for humans as well, so there is not much difference in our workflow; CC delivers faster and far far cheaper. And we tried it all, especially NOT having it integrated into an ide is brilliant. Before we used aider instead of cursor etc as we can control it: we don't want a human sitting there tapping 'yes, please do' or whatnot. We want it to finish, commit a PR and then review.