|
|
|
|
|
|
by groby_b
362 days ago
|
|
|
> Plus you shouldn't need an LLM to understand a codebase. Just make it more understandable! <laughs in legacy code> And fundamentally, that isn't a function of "capital". All code bases are shaped by the implicit assumptions of their writers. If there's a fundamental mismatch or gap between reader and writer assumptions, it won't be readable. LLMs are a way to make (some of) these implict assumptions more legible. They're not a panacea, but the idea of "just make it more understandable" is not viable. It's on par with "you don't need debuggers, just don't write bugs" |
|
|