What are your thoughts on the origin of the LLaMA leak? It's interesting that the training data was torrented, and so was the leak. Perhaps we will never know? For the OSINT folks, not a lot to go on, or maybe a lot, depending?
I didn’t ask for info, I asked for your views. I gave you all the info anyone has publicly, so you have enough to comment.
I suspect that it was a limited hangout self-own by Meta to claim that they aren’t responsible, and then they are doing research on a leaked LLM that they developed, but then was leaked, so they can claim that the subsequent research is not tainted by the fruit of the poisonous tree legal doctrine. Or, their torrent client or other software on the same machine had 0-days and they got hacked by someone on the Books3 swarm or knowledgeable of what IPs were connecting to it.
I appreciate your posts and I am replying to you to humbly ask you to post more. :P
I'm not really sure what you are insinuating? You think Meta leaked LAMA so they could claim, legally that they are in the clear for copyright violation? Sorry, I just don't really get what you want me to opine about.
If that is what you are asking, I don't think that's what happened. It's far more likely that it was just leaked or grabbed by a hacker
All written text is copyrighted, with few exceptions like court transcripts. I own the copyright to this inane comment. I sincerely doubt that all copyrighted material is scrubbed.
Which of the major commercial models discloses its dataset? Or are you just trusting some unfalsifiable self-serving PR characterization?