[sirgallo]

Performance comparisons are made against go sync.Map, with cmapv2 on par or sometimes exceeding is on different workloads. It is both lock-free and thread safe, using atomic operations. It also supports sharding out of the box. cmapv2 with 10m k/v pairs where keys and values are 64bytes was able to achieve 1.5m w/s and 3m r/s.

[pstuart]

Looks interesting, it would be nice to have the performance comparisons front and center on the readme.

[sirgallo]

sounds good, they are a bit hidden right now. also am most likely going to update the other docs.

[latchkey]

I've been using this one for years, can you do comparisons against it?

https://github.com/cornelk/hashmap

[jzelinskie]

Another good comparison would be against https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3#Map

[sirgallo]

definitely, I can expand my comparisons and benchmarks

[latchkey]

Honestly, if you're better than the rest, I would suggest collaborating with the existing solutions.

[sirgallo]

yes I can take a look, thanks for passing that along