[r2vcap]

I know many people are dissatisfied with existing C++ build systems like CMake, and I understand why. However, before creating a new build system, one must first understand C++’s current position. These days, C++ is chosen less frequently due to the wide range of alternatives available. Still, C++ shines when it comes to bridging distinct components. While it’s tempting to optimize for the simplest use cases and make things as concise as possible, real-world C++ build systems often need to handle a wide variety of tasks—many of which are not even C++-specific. That’s where CMake proves its value: it can do almost anything. If a new build system can’t handle those cases, it’s likely to be dead on arrival.

[AI314159]

An excellent point! I hope I'll be able to handle those cases in the future, and I am kind of seeing this situation: people aren't understanding that this is _the first alpha pre-release of 0.1.0 software._ It isn't going to do everything. It was mostly a test of my skills that started to turn into a serious project, which it wasn't really intended to be.