[Disposal8433]

> We waste so much time dealing with syntax, fixing bugs, naming variables, setting up configs

I definitely don't do that. It's a very small part of my job. And AFAIK, LLMs cannot generate assembly language yet, and CPUs don't understand English.

[pyman]

We live in a world with 7,000 human languages and around 8,000 programming languages. Most people only learn a handful, which limits how effectively they can express intent. This is inefficient.

In theory, one universal language would solve that, for both humans and machines.

Maybe the best solution isn't one language (English, Spanish, Golang, or Python), but one interface that understands all of them. And that's what LLMs might become.

[sitzkrieg]

ive used various llms to generate x86, mips, riscv assembly with mostly usable results. you tend to see what it was trained on pretty quickly if you go deep tho