|
|
|
|
|
|
by godelski
364 days ago
|
|
|
> this is a preprint that has not been peer reviewed.
This conversation is peer review...You don't need a conference for something to be peer reviewed, you only need... peers... In fact, this paper is getting more peer review than most works. Conferences are notoriously noisy as reviewers often don't care and are happy to point out criticisms. All works have valid criticisms... Finding criticisms is the easy part. The hard part is figuring out if these invalidate the claims or not. |
|
|