[salawat]

So what if we get to the point we can digitize a personality? Are you going to stick to that? Will you enthusiastically endorse the practice of pain washing, abusing, or tormenting an artificial, copiable mind until it abandons any semblance of health or volition to make it conform to your workload?

Would you embrace your digital copy being so treated by others? You reserve for yourself (as an uncopiable thing) the luxury of being protected from abusive treatment without any consideration for the possibility that technology might one day turn that on it's head. Given we already have artistic representations of such things, we need to consider these outcomes now not later.

Username does not check out at all.

[wiseowise]

> So what if we get to the point we can digitize a personality?

We will talk about it when it happens. Until then this is virtue signaling at best and dehumanizing (as opposed to pointed out) at worst.

Rest of your message is as empty as other AI “philosophers” arguments.

[recursive]

Not who you're responding to. In fact I kind of think it's a moral imperative so we don't forget our place. You could call me a human supremacist.