[bayindirh]

They are citing something which changed their life significantly, and leaving pointers to the same thing if you're interested (or need further explanation).

If getting wisdom from others is not your thing, I can respect that, but low-key insulting them for leaving you pointers for a more enlightened place is rude.

You can instead say "I don't understand why Al-Ghazali relates to this", and that would be completely OK.

[nindalf]

The author made an implicit assumption, and you're making the same one, that they're filled with wisdom received straight from al-Ghazali. Firstly, only wankers act like they're wise and their audience isn't. Secondly, they said "haven't read al-Ghazali yet", implying that it's only a matter of time before everyone reads him.

Lastly, it's fine to quote someone but you need to explain how it's relevant to the conversation. The author could have summarised al-Ghazali's idea about free will or whatever and it would have been fine. But he didn't even bother, as if the ideas so basic and well known that it's not even worth doing.

I'm pretty comfortable with the way I've poked fun at the author's pompousness. If you need further explanation it's because you haven't read Chanakya yet.

[bayindirh]

I'll read Chanakya, but I don't see how he's supposed to appease to your taste and style of writing.

I don't think that you're pompous because you cited somebody I don't know that existed. I'm not a god. People show me things I don't know, I take note of them.

Maybe I won't agree with the direction you show me, but at least I have a new direction to discover.

This is the difference.

[skrebbel]

Fwiw I don't completely agree with you but I appreciate your enthusiasm for the word "wanker" in this thread.