Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lifthrasiir 377 days ago
Only when the underlying JS implementation does this naively. In reality JS implementations do a lot of optimizations which often can reduce the time complexity.
1 comments

"The compiler will take care of it", funny, heard that one before, I'd profile it just to be on the safe side...
I didn't mean that. JS doesn't have any lower-level interface for handling memory, so such optimization has to be in the implementation. It should be quite obvious that relying on such optimization can be problematic.