Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stlava 375 days ago
I feel that if you need an LLM to help pivot between existing data it just means the operability tool has gaps in user functionality. This is by far my biggest gripe with DataDog today. All the data is there but going from database query to front end traces should be easy but is not.

Sure we can use an LLM but I can for now click around faster (if those breadcrumbs exist) than it can reason.

Also the LLM would only point to a direction and I’m still going to have to use the UI to confirm.

2 comments

One of the interesting things an agent can do that no individual telemetry tool does effectively is make deductions and integrate information across data sources. It's a big open challenge for us here; in any given incident, we're looking at Honeycomb traces, OpenSearch for system logs, and Prometheus metrics in a VictoriaMetrics cluster. Given tool calls for each of these data sources, an agent can generate useful integrated hypotheses without any direct integration between the data sources. That's pretty remarkable.
VictoriaMetrics team member here.

Have you had a chance to play with VictoriaLogs? If not, then I highly recommend to test it. Our team is also working on implementing traces in top of Jaeger and VictoriaLogs, see https://victoriametrics.com/blog/dev-note-distributed-tracin...

The whole point of Datadog is that you can seamlessly go between products for the same event source. Doesn’t it just highlight a setup issue?