[mschuster91]

> Yes I did notice, and do the numbers and results that we are talking about not apply to them?

They do but still I'm not willing to give these two multi-billion dollar megacorps a hall pass for penny pinching with deadly results when our car industry shows that better ways of doing things exist.

Not everything needs to be done by the typical Silicon Valley strategy of "move fast, break things" - especially not when the things being broken are literal human lives.

[jstimpfle]

Quite frankly, I'm not an expert in the technologies or what numbers have been published -- but 50 fatalities which was brought up above is nothing compared to the lives saved by a safer technology. It may even be nothing compared to the lives saved by making the cars just a bit cheaper or making them arrive at the market just a bit earlier, or may be nothing compared to the fatalities that happened when people were rushing to the car store, or... you get the point.

Calling Teslas garbage on wheels doesn't help either, when the accident and defect statistics seem to indicate otherwise. Not a Tesla fanboy by the way, but the discussion around Tesla seems to me to be unfair especially in certain circles.

[mschuster91]

> Calling Teslas garbage on wheels doesn't help either, when the accident and defect statistics seem to indicate otherwise.

Uh, Tesla routinely has people wait for months for spare parts [1]. Bad logistics, okay, excusable for a company just a year or two in business, but Tesla is in for well over a decade now. That's also a contributor in why Tesla vehicles cost significantly more to insure [2], with reports of carriers refusing Tesla vehicles at all cropping up even a year ago [3], and all models being listed as "difficult to insure" in NYC [4]. In Germany, the situation appears to be similar, with serious premiums compared to other cars [5]. And that's all before thinking about the current wave of politically motivated vandalism - say some idiot bashes in a window, good luck getting a replacement in time, not to mention the insurance premium hike that's inevitable after filing a claim.

As for defects, well, the build quality of the Cybertruck is so much a meme at this point that I won't waste time researching on it. Steel sheets literally falling off the vehicle. The bloody thing turning rusty from ordinary rain. No matter what, that's inacceptable.

> Not a Tesla fanboy by the way, but the discussion around Tesla seems to me to be unfair especially in certain circles.

It's not like the criticism isn't well founded in facts. The decision of forgoing LIDAR (by Musk himself, who called LIDAR a "crutch" [6]) has been debated for years, the constant overpromises and underdeliveries led to a multitude of legal issues and SEC trouble, so did the various other issues surrounding lemon laws, general build quality and spare parts availability that I've linked before. And there's a shocking report of someone claiming to be a Tesla IT insider from 2018 that details very shoddy IT practices [7].

And that's before getting to the Cybertruck which is such a dangerous design that it's deemed unsafe to drive on European roads (with the "workarounds" some people found [8] being under serious questioning) or the completely deranged actions of its leader of the last month.

[1] https://www.carscoops.com/2023/11/tesla-owners-stuck-waiting...

[2] https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a42709679/tesla-insurance-...

[3] https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaModelY/comments/18yrag1/why_ar...

[4] https://www.dfs.ny.gov/consumers/auto_insurance/difficult-to...

[5] https://tff-forum.de/t/versicherung-fuer-tesla-extrem-teuer/...

[6] https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/22/anyone-relying-on-lidar-is...

[7] https://x.com/atomicthumbs/status/1032939617404645376

[8] https://efahrer.chip.de/news/tesla-fan-sichert-sich-eu-zulas...