|
|
|
|
|
by mathgladiator
5045 days ago
|
|
I hope he means > if (obj != null && obj.isValid()) { } Which is semantically correct due to the fail-fast evaluate of AND, it does require a double check since it's strange from a logic point of view. This is one the reasons that brace languages are hard to optimize since you can't commute things that ought to commute. |
|
If the two checks were independent (pure functions), it's not difficult for a compiler to determine that given enough program visibility.