|
|
|
|
|
by KronisLV
372 days ago
|
|
If you wanted accurate statistics for each language, you'd probably have to go closer to the source: - How many downloads for the compiler/runtime/toolchains have?
- How many downloads do the packages on the package manager (if any) have?
- How many downloads do base containers have? How popular are the SaSS/PaSS offerings geared towards the languages?
But of course, doing that for a bunch of stacks would be quite difficult and time consuming, so people feel confident in just looking at Google Trends or an equivalent (or aggregating similar surface level data from a bunch of providers) and just calling it a day. |
|
This will overrepresent languages that rely heavily on external packages, such as JavaScript and Rust, while underrepresenting languages with a large standard library where packages are not needed as much.