[JumpCrisscross]

> Only for security vulnerabilities that "Apple is aware may have been actively exploited"

That still leaves a perfectly adequate machine for most common uses.

[fsflover]

Would you be fine with your family running a vulnerable, insecure machine for everything, including communication with you?

[fsflover]

I don't understand why I'm downvoted. I don't think it's acceptable to keep a machine with known vulnerabilities "not yet actively exploited" for "most common uses". The defense of Apple here goes too far.