|
|
|
|
|
|
by weird_trousers
370 days ago
|
|
|
It would be “eventually good” if, and only if, Vision problems were solved at 100% F1-Score. Which is absolutely not! So, to me, I expected bad and I received… bad results. Paying for this crap is just throwing money out the window.
Those startups should solve problems and them let people pay for it, for 99% accuracy, not at minimum of 66%. |
|
|