[somenameforme]

It states that reforestation would result in a reduction in excess of 25% of all observed warming since preindustrial times. And there is every reason to believe there's even more feedback systems we are, as of yet, unaware of that could increase that further (though also potentially decrease it of course).

In any case it's certainly not spitting at a fire.

[lo0dot0]

It's also not possible to tap into the full amount of reduction because of the land use

[somenameforme]

The figure they measured, in terms of global acreage, works out to an increase in forestry across 8% of the Earth's land area. That's completely viable, in fact some multiple of that is as well. The overwhelming majority of land on this planet is doing pretty much nothing owing to our habit of packing ourselves into tiny densely packed cities which are supported by a fairly small amount of agriculture - 39% of all land there to be exact. [1]

So this is completely viable, and then some! Even more so if one accounts for the fact that increases in CO2 are creating a substantially greener planet making this even easier.

[1] - https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.AGRI.ZS