|
|
|
|
|
by Retro_Dev
376 days ago
|
|
It is my opinion that even if Zig were nothing more than a syntactical tweak of C, it would be preferable over C. C has a lot of legacy cruft that can't go away, and decades of software built with poor practices and habits. The status-quo in Zig is evolving to help mitigate these issues. One obvious example that sets Zig apart from C is error handling built into the language itself. |
|
I also do not see how having decades of legacy software is holding anybody back doing new stuff in C in a better way. New C code can be very nice.