I think the OP's page works because these coding agents identify themselves as the PR author so the creator can just search Github's issue tracker for things like is:pr+head:copilot or is:pr+head:codex
It seems like Claude Code doesn't do that? some preliminary searching reveals that PRs generated by people using Claude Code use their own user account but may sign that they used Claude, example https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/pull/1732
I believe these are all "background" agents that, by default, are meant to write code and issue pull requests without you watching/babysitting/guiding the process. I haven't used Claude Code in a while, but from what I recall, it's not that.
If you enable it in permissions, Claude is very happy to do so. For personal fun/experimental projects (usually I give it arXiv papers to implement), I generally have a couple Claude instances (on different projects) just chugging along all day. I have them write really detailed plans at the start (50-100 steps in the implementation plan, plus actual specifications for project structure, dev practices, and what the actual goals are). I iterate on these plan documents by having Claude write QUESTIONS.md which has dev questions for me to clarify, which I fill out with answers, and then instruct Claude to update the plan docs with my answers. Then most of my interaction throughout the day is just saying something like "P18" to implement implementation plan step #18. I instruct it in CLAUDE.md to stop after each step, output what automated tests have been written for P18's features, and I require that the LLM write a demo script that I can run that shows the features, using real APIs. I'm having a great time with it.
I'm on the $100 max plan. The default config uses Opus up until some percent of capacity, then uses Sonnet after, which resulted in my having to wait for 30 minutes to an hour to reset usage after running them for 8-10 hours. I've since switched to configuring it to only use Sonnet, then for what I know are "big" questions, I'll run opus for just that. Since then, I have yet to hit limits, so I don't feel the need for the $200 one.
I really need to try giving it a $100 month. Really not sure it's worth it, but if i'm less concerned about throttling or cost it might be more fun, interesting, etc.
It makes a psychological difference, yeah. I'm happy now just throwing any whim at it. For instance, I've been meaning for years to fix my disks, since every new computer just has me put the old drives into it, plus the new ones. Prior to the consolidation I had Claude do, oldest was from 2007 (good job, Western Digital 20 years ago). I had Claude write a plan on how to move files my most recent spinning disks, and also redo my mounts (for organization and improving my mount flags). I had it write the plan, I went "yeah", had it write a new fstab and a script to perform the moves in the project folder, had it "ultrathink" and web search a couple times to iterate on those for improvements it could suggest. Then I reviewed them, and had it apply the changes in a Claude instance with no automatic permissions beyond reading files in the project directory, so I manually approved the system modifications each.
Looks that way, but Anthropic docs vaguely say it is vague. I know I haven't hit any hard caps since only using opus manually, but I wouldn't know if I'm being throttled otherwise, or at least it isn't severe enough that I notice given they just churn in the background.
The prompts in Claude Code have specific instructions on doing pull requests.
```
grep 'gh pr ' ~/.claude/local/node_modules/@anthropic-ai/claude-code/cli.js
- Create PR using gh pr create with the format below. Use a HEREDOC to pass the body to ensure correct formatting.
gh pr create --title "the pr title" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
1. Use \`gh pr view --json number,headRepository\` to get the PR number and repository info
1. If no PR number is provided in the args, use ${O4.name}("gh pr list") to show open PRs
2. If a PR number is provided, use ${O4.name}("gh pr view <number>") to get PR details
3. Use ${O4.name}("gh pr diff <number>") to get the diff
```
It seems like Claude Code doesn't do that? some preliminary searching reveals that PRs generated by people using Claude Code use their own user account but may sign that they used Claude, example https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/pull/1732