|
|
|
|
|
|
by a11r
380 days ago
|
|
|
The system prompt in this experiment limits the solution to always spell out the concrete moves verbally. A human solving the Tower of Hanoi gives up around N=4 and goes off to invent a recursive solution instead. Prompted differently, the LLM would solve these puzzles just fine. Here is my complete review/analysis of the paper: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/art-abstraction-human-advanta... edit: fixed typo |
|
|