|
|
|
|
|
by skydhash
372 days ago
|
|
TLA+ specs don’t verify code. They verify design. Such design can be expressed in whatever, including pseudocode (think algorithms notation in textbooks). Then you write the TLA specs that will judge if invariants are truly respected. Once you’re sure of the design, you can go and implement it, but there’s no hard constraints like a type system. |
|
The subtext is pretty obvious, I think: that standards, on message boards, are being set for LLM-generated code that are ludicrously higher than would be set for people-generated code.