[tshaddox]

I think using the example of Nazi content and the first amendment is a distraction. What’s relevant is speech that is not legally protected.

Should the New York Times have civil libel liability for what they publish in a newspaper? Should Google have civil libel liability for what they publish on YouTube?

[Manuel_D]

> Should Google have civil libel liability for what they publish on YouTube?

They do.

What they don't have liability for, is content that users post to YouTube.

[beej71]

For me, the more pertinent question is should I be liable for not-legally-protected content people post to my comment section on my website?