|
|
|
|
|
by blagie
372 days ago
|
|
Because such cases don't really exist. Your text used an unusual double ellipsis (" .. " instead of "... "), uncommon (not rare) generative vocabulary ("panacea"), etc. Statistics on those allows for pretty good re-identification. Ditto for times you do things and work schedule. Etc. It's not "obviously identifiable," but a buffer overflow is not "obviously exploitable." Rather, it takes a very, very expert individual to write a script before everyone can exploit it. Ditto here. |
|