[kylebenzle]

Thank you very much for a great reply but in no way can I see how destroying unsold vehicles can never be better in selling them for less.

If you say they can't lower the price because it signals to investors there's a problem doesn't it signal the same problem having a massive amount of vehicles unsold and then destroyed? How is one signal better than the other? So they're signaling they've got so much money they just don't care? That also seems like a bad signal to send. Far better to say publicly, hey we made a mistake this vehicle is not selling now we're going to sell what we made for less and stop making it.

None of this theorizing about signaling to investors makes any sense as long as we know that the vehicles aren't selling.