[dragonwriter]

> So then the courts need to find who is setting their chats do be deleted and order them to stop.

No, actually, it doesn't. Ordering a party to stop destroying evidence relevant to a current case (which is its obligation even without a court order) irrespective of whether someone else asks it to destroy that evidence is both within the well-established power of the court, and routine.

> Or find specific infringing chatters and order OpenAI to preserve these specified users’ logs.

OpenAI is the alleged infringer in the case.